Join our free webinar.
Register Now

Why “Heermandi” Was a Waste of Resources: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

by Pia

Why "Heermandi" Was a Waste of Resources: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Hello, discerning readers! Welcome back to Aware Naari, where we analyze and discuss topics that matter to you. Today, we’re diving into a critical review of “Heermandi,” a much-anticipated project that, unfortunately, did not live up to the expectations.

The Good: Production Design and Cinematography

Production Design
Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s films are known for their opulent sets and grandiose designs, and “Heermandi” is no exception. The lavish sets and attention to detail in recreating the historical period are commendable. The intricate costumes and elaborate set pieces transport the audience to a different era, showcasing Bhansali’s eye for visual splendor.
Cinematography
The film’s cinematography is another highlight. The beautiful frames, rich color palettes, and sweeping camera movements add a visually stunning dimension to the narrative. Every scene is meticulously crafted to create a visual feast, which is a signature of Bhansali’s directorial style.

The Bad: Nepotism Debate and Emotional Disconnect

Nepotism Debate
The casting of “Heermandi” has reignited the debate on nepotism in Bollywood. With several prominent roles being given to actors with industry connections, the film fails to bring fresh talent to the forefront. This reliance on star kids and established names undermines the potential for discovering new and diverse talent, keeping the nepotism debate alive and well.
Emotional Disconnect
The film attempts to evoke strong emotions by depicting the plight of the tawaifs (courtesans) and incorporating a patriotic angle. However, these emotional appeals fall flat. The characters lack depth and relatability, making it hard for the audience to empathize with their struggles. The patriotic elements feel forced and do not seamlessly integrate with the primary narrative, resulting in a fragmented storyline.

The Ugly: Inauthentic Dialogue and Overdramatic Style

1

Inauthentic Dialogue
One of the most significant drawbacks of “Heermandi” is its heavy and inauthentic dialogue writing. The dialogues are laden with poetic flourishes and archaic language that feel out of place and unnatural. This creates a disconnect between the characters and the audience, as the dialogue does not flow naturally or reflect real human interactions.

2

Overdramatic Style
While Bhansali’s dramatic style has worked well in his previous films, it does not serve “Heermandi” well. The exaggerated performances and theatrical expressions detract from the film’s authenticity. The story could have benefited from a more nuanced and restrained approach, allowing the characters and plot to shine through without the over-the- top dramatics.

Conclusion: A Wasted Opportunity

“Heermandi” had the potential to be a powerful and evocative series, but it ultimately squandered its resources. The production design and cinematography are undoubtedly beautiful, but they cannot compensate for the film’s deeper flaws. The nepotism debate continues to overshadow the industry, and the emotional aspects of the story fail to resonate.
The heavy-handed dialogue and dramatic style that Bhansali brings did not complement the script, making the viewing experience more of a long agony than an engaging narrative. While the film has its moments of visual brilliance, it is ultimately an example of style over substance, failing to deliver a compelling and cohesive story.

Aware Naari's Critical Eye

Critical Analysis
We hope this review has provided you with a thorough understanding of why “Heermandi” fell short of expectations. Stay critical, stay curious, and continue exploring the world of cinema with us.
Discerning Perspective
At Aware Naari, we pride ourselves on our discerning perspective and our ability to analyze and discuss topics that matter to you, our readers.
Empowering Voice
Until next time, Aware Naari